Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparative nutrient and sensory analysis of eight different commercial Chlorella powders

  • Felix Melcher
  • , Tillmann Peest
  • , Diego Garay
  • , Florian Utz
  • , Michael Paper
  • , Andrea Spaccasassi
  • , Lisa Obermaier
  • , Jennifer Schneiderbanger
  • , Max Koch
  • , Daniel Garbe
  • , Tom Nilges
  • , Thomas Becker
  • , Michael Rychlik
  • , Corinna Dawid
  • , Wolfram M. Brück
  • , Nikolaus I. Stellner
  • , Thomas B. Brück
  • Technical University of Munich
  • HES‑SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland – Valais‑Wallis
  • TUM CREATE
  • Chair of Food Chemistry and Molecular Sensory Science
  • Professorship of Functional Phytomatbolomic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

A growing global population and climate change challenge conventional agriculture and global food safety. Microalgae are an emerging sustainable nutrient food resource, increasingly regarded as an important component for the human diet. The chlorophyte Chlorella sp. is regulated and commercialized for food applications. Commercial Chlorella preparations are either produced by heterotrophic fermentation or photoautotrophic cultivation in bioreactors or outdoor ponds. Products can differ significantly with regard to taxonomy of the production strain, changed genetic properties due to strain development, cultivation conditions, and downstream biomass processing methods. Notably, heterotrophic strains may be adapted to generate little or no photosynthetic pigments, resulting in yellow or white variant. In this study, eight different commercial Chlorella products from different EU suppliers were analyzed and compared regarding identity of the production strain, macro-and micronutrient profiles, sensory properties, as well as microbial load. The production processes featured different cultivation methods, production strains, genetic variants (yellow and white) and downstream processing methods. Data indicates significant variations between the Chlorella products. White and yellow Chlorella products showed different protein and taste profiles compared to green, photosynthetically competent wild type strains. We confirmed relatively high and stable protein concentrations but could detect variations in sugar and specifically lipid and vitamin profiles depending on strain, cultivation and downstream processing methods. The microbial load varied strongly between closed and open cultivation systems but was compliant with legislative (EFSA) specifications for all samples. The comparative nutrient- and sensory data set presented in this study will aid in selecting algae products for the development of innovative foods, thereby accelerating adoption and differentiation of algae food products.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1534438
JournalFrontiers in Food Science and Technology
Volume5
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Chlorella powder
  • innovative food
  • microalgae
  • nutritional profile
  • sensory analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative nutrient and sensory analysis of eight different commercial Chlorella powders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this